On Wed, 2005-16-11 at 09:09 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > On 11/16/05, Andreas J. Guelzow <aguelzow taliesin ca> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-16-11 at 13:14 +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > > > > > > Quim Gil wrote: > > > > Gosh, we are not the EU Parliament or the US Congress. Neither have we > > > > 28 candidates to choose from. If we keep kicking off candidates for > > > > procedural reasons we will end up not needing to vote at all. > > > > > > Hear, hear. A bit of perspective will go a long way. What ever happened > > > to trust? > > > > It went out of the window with all the talk about "untrustworthy > > candidates" in the recent referendum debate? > > To be very, very clear, I never said anyone was untrustworthy, just > that people were running out of a sense of obligation. If anything, > those people are so dedicated to GNOME that they are more trustworthy > than the average candidate, not less. I never said _you_ did. The exact words used were: "It's not about radical things happening, it's about untrustworthy people being elected." see http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2005-October/msg00068.html Andreas -- Andreas J. Guelzow, Professor Dept. of Mathematical & Computing Sciences Concordia University College of Alberta
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part