Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Preliminary results
- From: Rob Adams <readams readams net>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME Foundation Elections - Preliminary results
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:31:29 -0800
That's a very different argument than simply that she's a woman,
however, and certainly a much more compelling one. I did not mean to
imply (and I apologize if that was what was understood from my message)
that either of these women would not be qualified or would not do a good
job on the board.
-Rob
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 13:07 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 09:18:58AM -0800, Rob Adams wrote:
> > I think that's pretty unfair. The candidates who were elected are all
> > active well-known members of the Gnome community. Saying that a women
> > should have been elected solely for that reason just serves to minimize
> > the very real and significant contributions that the electees have made
> > to the Gnome community.
>
> Let's say that we tend to elect people from the same technical core,
> and that Anne background would have provided some diversity. We are
> not very versed in law or relation with governements while she
> has knowledge in these domain. I hope she will be able to work
> within the "marketing" side of the foundation and get elected
> next year, if she candidates again.
>
> Daniel
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]