On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 19:15 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > The GNOME libraries must be usable for running proprietary applications. > That why they are all released under the LGPL, MIT/X11, or other Licences > allowing such use. I only won't contribute with code to MIT/X11 styles of licenses. > If you "don't want my lines of code in proprietary software" > then I understand it as you opposing your code being used (by linking or > embedding the line is thin) in such application. As a result you should > not contribute to the GNOME libraries, because they are expected to have > such an use. Linking is a price I'd be willing to pay to make available some library to other incompatible Free Software, but I do prefer GPL'ed libraries. > > > You can still work on GPL'ed applications on top if you want. > > I have a mixed mind right about now about a few problems with this > > community... > > Seems to me that you have a very different set of goals than most of > the people developping the GNOME platform. You presume too much. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part