On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 18:55 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:47:35PM +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 16:35 -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > > I am really not following what the issue is, and I smack myself for > > > entering and now reentering this thread. > > > > Many developers don't want to contribute to proprietary software. > > > > I don't want to write a single line of code entering a proprietary > > program. > > Then it's 100% clear that you don't want to code on Evolution, > nor on any of the GNOME core libraries, period, end of the story. I don't want my lines of code in proprietary software, but I don't want to exlude other Free Software that would be GPL incompatible. You presume too much. > You can still work on GPL'ed applications on top if you want. I have a mixed mind right about now about a few problems with this community... Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part