Re: Yes to Publicity! Not to Anonimity!

[George <jirka 5z com>]

On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:02:47PM -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:12, George wrote:
> > Please give an EXPLICIT scenario of the
> > proposed system where an abuse is possible in such a way where it is not
> > possible with the system as it was done a year ago.  As in, give a sequence
> > of exact events and things some 'evil' person must do that are NOT possible
> > in the old system.
> 
> Soon after the first posting on the proposed anonymous election methods
> changes were proposed (e.g.inclusion of a counter 001... etc). So to
> answer your question you would first need to specify the exact method
> that is proposed.

Try with either modification.  I dunno what the 'etc' refers to as there was
only one 'addition' (the counter).  So use that method.  Also assume that
the list of people who did vote is known for verification purposes.

George

-- 
George <jirka 5z com>
   If you think nobody cares if you're alive,
   try missing a couple of car payments.
                       -- Earl Wilson