Re: Yes to Publicity! Not to Anonimity! Was: Re: GNOME Foundation Annual Elections - proposal

On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 17:37, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Daniel Veillard">
> >   No problem, I wasn't objecting to publishing it, just pointing out
> > it wasn't really a by-laws change.
> >   We should count the number of people objecting the change. I think
> > it's 5 or 6 so far. I don't know precisely the membership size, probably
> > around 350 that would mean 18 person asking for a vote to force it,
> > maybe someone from the election comitee has the numbers.
> It would also be reasonable to wait for a proposed voting system. I would
> only be happy with anonymous voting if the system was sufficiently secure
> and reliable, and I imagine that's a pretty strong sentiment amongst the
> membership.

I believe the number of people supporting the change by posting a
message on the list is also in the 5 to 6 range, probably less if we
discount board members.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]