On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 13:30, Daniel Veillard wrote: [snip] > At this point, and unless more dissent voices emerge or some kind > of explicit scenario provided proving a serious trouble with the > new voting process is shown, I think the board should ultimately > accept this plan, probably at the next meeting 23rd September. So > there is still ample time to discuss this but I think other people > who have strong feelings about this should express themselves in > the meantime :-) Given that this proposed change reflects a rather large change in the openness of the Foundation elections, and that it's only been before the foundation membership for THREE days, I think that proposing that the board do anything at all with this is terribly premature. I haven't even had time to look up some of the national governmental rationale's behind anonymous voting, let alone to digest and form a reasoned opinion on the matter. Greg - a cranky, hopefully thoughtful GNOME Foundation member.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part