Le mer 22/10/2003 à 18:06, Sander Vesik a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le mer 22/10/2003 à 02:15, Sander Vesik a écrit : > > > >>Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > >>>Actually considering the number of people here that do work in monospace > >>>environments I suspect you'll find more demand for monospace than serif > >>>(which lacks italic anyway) > > > > > >>Lack of italic Vera Serif is unfortunate - esp as there is mono italic > >>and bold italic which i can't imagine getting used all that often > > > > > > In tech doc all monospace variants are heavily used. > > > > Vera was released for Gnome, and most computer people use only two fonts > > - a variable one and a monospace one (for terminals, mailers, news > > readers, RAD/text editors, tech doc...) > > > > Sure - but terminals basicly have mono & mono bold (at most). Some > editors use italic (highlighting comments). I can't at the moment think > of any largescale use of mono bold italic. But all of this is practicly > always just ascii, as programming languages usualy insist on code being > in ascii. The code yes, the comments no. Having to change app every 100 lines to read non-ascii parts quickly gets annoying -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=