Re: The timestamp thing

[Paul Wellner Bou <paul purecodes org>]

Hi Stephane,

I keep commenting on this issue although you know my opinion.

Stephane Delcroix wrote:
> List,
>
> 	That issue is _not_ ignored at all, and is on my top 3 priority list
> (that list is public btw). It's not solved yet cause a proper fix is a
> huge thing to do, that require rewriting a lot of parts of f-spot.

Although I am far away from your development, mono and f-spot knowledge 
and experience: The bug is ignored, as this bug is easy to fix. What 
might be more complicated is the implementation of a proper time and 
time zone handling. But fixing f-spot so that the exif time is not 
touched was even possible for me.

> 	If you're under the impression that I'm ignoring it, you're not looking
> closely enough, or not on the right time scale. I just stopped
> discussing it over and over again cause discussion doesn't write code.

I spent more time in discussions as in writing code as the approach I 
wrote is working. Although you said that "not touching the exif date 
would be the worst solution", I have no idea which approach would be 
acceptable by you. If I'd know it, I'd start coding.

But I don't think I am the only one with the opinion that not touching 
the exif date would be the best solution.

Regards
Paul.