On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:58, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 11:52 -0500, Michael Terry wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 09:18, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > another thing.... I don't understand the logic with the int1 and int2 > > > thing here. What's the deal with that? > > > > > > Jeff > > > > [snip] > > > > This logic is because some glade file (mail/local-config.glade -- you > > can see it in my patch) wanted to create an image widget that had an > > alignment scale of x=1, y=0. Most other glade image widgets were x=0, > > y=0. So, I figured that there was some interest in an optional scale > > argument from the glade files. This int1, int2 business is basically > > two boolean argument that say "to scale or not to scale" for the > > alignment widget created in that function. > > > > Is mail/local-config.glade just goofing up and it should be 0, 0? In > > which case, I can remove the int1, int2 code. > > my guess is that (assuming 1,0 is wrong), that it is just glade messing > up and that you should just ignore those values. > > Jeff OK. My final patch will get rid of the int1, int2 business. Thank you for the comments so far. -mt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part