Re: [Evolution] Re +1 : how insert a .gif into a mail



On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 16:29 -0600, Anonymous Japhering via evolution-
list wrote:
On Mon, 2020-11-16 at 15:07 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2020-11-15 at 20:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf via evolution-list
wrote:
IMO it's important to point out that inserting, attaching an image
shouldn't fail. Sending large images usually fails, because email
servers usually limit the size of emails they will accept.
It's a different kettle of fish.
Am I mistake? Is it already impossible to insert or attach 109.0 MB?
If so why? Is the size per se limited via RFC?

I would expect it to be possible to ATTACH a 109MB document - in fact
I'm pretty sure I've done it.

I would not expect it to work, in any mail client anywhere, to INSERT a
109MB image/document.  The body of an e-mail is a Document-Object-Model 
kind of thing, and I just wouldn't expect any message edit to survive
such a traumatic event.

Much less the ISP enforced limits on the maximum size of both an email and
an attachment.  I can't remember the last time I sent email or email with
attachment that was larger than 10MB as most of the services I operate through
have a 10MB total size limit.

Gmail is I believe the most popular email service in the world and had
a limit of 25MB last time I looked. Certainly not 100MB.

One has to wonder if all the cloud file services (dropbox, box, onecloud, google
drive, etc) came about because of ever shrinking limits on the total size of an
email message.

I don't believe they have shrunk. Limits used to be a lot smaller than
they are now. However the limit on the size of the message being sent
is not a limit on the total number of bytes being delivered. I think
we've all seen examples of some low-level official sending off a 20MB
attachment to all 3500 company employees when they could have achieved
the same result by just sending a link.

poc



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]