Re: [Evolution] About performance

[Thomas Prost <thomas prost prosts info>]

Am Freitag, den 17.05.2013, 09:29 +0100 schrieb Pete Biggs: 
> > > To be honest most of the grouching about the stability and speed of Evo
> > > seems to be coming from Ubuntu users
> >
> > Or people with *unbelievably* ancient versions.  Every time I see
> > someone complaining about 2.32 or even 2.28... my jaw drops.  I just
> > don't get it - why do that to yourself?
>
> As others have said, these are the versions on current *supported*
> distros.  Specifically RHEL 5 (and consequently CentOS 5, Scientific
> Linux 5 etc.) is on Evolution version 2.12.3; RHEL 6 (and clones) is on
> 2.28.3.
>
> The whole point of RHEL is stability, not cutting edge, consequently
> they stick to versions of software that are consistent and they back
> port bug fixes where appropriate.  To be honest I've never had any
> complaints from my users about the instability or speed of Evolution on
> CentOS 5 or 6 (but that may be more to do with my users!).
>
> BTW, the use of 2.32.x versions is because that's the last version
> before Gnome 3 came out - so those distros that don't like Gnome 3 (and
> I've never understood why)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ galore users wouldn't like gnome3 ???
I do !
-- 
Thomas Prost <thomas prost prosts info>
ProstsInfo