Re: [Evolution] Evolution's mega bandwidth hogging
- From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam whitemice org>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution's mega bandwidth hogging
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:12:06 -0500
On Mon, 2011-01-10 at 13:40 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Montag, den 10.01.2011, 06:32 -0500 schrieb Adam Tauno Williams:
Currently, it's connected to Gmail via IMAP+.
There is no reason to check-for-new-messages if you are using IMAP+ with
IDLE enabled. That is the *point* of IDLE; the server notifies the
client of changes; the client does not need to poll the server.
If that is the case and if there is still an option available in the UI
of the IMAP+ account settings, I'd call that a UI bug.
Please file a ticket in bugzilla.gnome.org against Evolution.
I don't think so. If you look at the IDLE option it says "(if
supported)". Some server's don't support IDLE, so the user may want to
still poll [although at a *SANE* interval, *NOT* every minute]. Also
IDLE only is effective if the connection stays up [as it should, for at
least 30 minutes]. If the server or client closes the connection [1]
then IDLE can't work. The same is true if the network is unreliable
[like a cellular connection] and the connection gets dropped. So
setting the check-for-new mail to an interval like every-60-minutes
while having IDLE enabled makes sense. IDLE works well [when supported]
and is very efficient, but the occasional poll is still required in most
cases.
[1] GMail used to do this a *lot* - GMail is *not* a real IMAP provider
- maybe they've fixed this - I don't know or care.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]