Re: [Evolution] Heads Up: Debian issues on testing/unstable



On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 15:00 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 21:40 +0200, guenther wrote:
So I have been down that road way too often the last week. More than
once on a daily basis is sufficient to post this "just in case"...

There currently is a known Debian specific issue, biting a lot of users:

As a first step towards GNOME 2.14 in Debian, glib has been updated from

[snip]
know exactly, what I am doing. Every fucking bit matters. And please
don't mind, if I am curt -- until we solved the issue. :)

Hi, Guenther.

This issue does *not* affect up-to-date Sid users anymore.  -1.1
or -2 (forget which) fixed it.

You forgot the caveat about me not being a debian user. What is Sid
again exactly? ;-)  OK, according to google, this is unstable.

Well, as I mentioned in the OP, this doesn't seem to strike unstable
users a lot. However, bug 336623 [1] looks like this indeed is an issue
using 2.4.2.1-2.

Besides this, the evolution-plugins issue stands as well. The separate
plugins package isn't updated automatically -- updating manually from
-1.1 to the matching -2 solved this for at least one user on IRC. He was
the first one to find out about this. Previously downgrading glib solved
it for 2 other fellows...

Yeah, a little bit confusing, isn't it?


Anyway, thanks for the follow up and more details on this, Ron. :)  I'd
appreciate it, if debian users could post all relevant information to
come, especially when the fixed packages are out.

...guenther


[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336623

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]