Re: [Evolution] threading didn't work in reply-to-all

On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:19 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm
subscribed to at work.
so why didn't it "thread"?  I have the correct view, because other
messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other,
but this one isn't.

If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same
mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread.  Unless there is
something else going on.

Well then, "there is something going on"!

Both messages are still in my inbox, unthreaded after a few restarts of

A third message, a reply from the OP to myself, IS threaded under my
message,but none of them are under the original.  Like so:

- A: original message from OP to list

- other emails

- B: reply to message 'A' from me to list
  - C: reply to 'B' from OP to me

wierd huh? I still have all three messages in my inbox if you want
further info.

Iain Buchanan <iaindb netspace net au>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]