Re: [Evolution] threading didn't work in reply-to-all

[Iain Buchanan <iaindb netspace net au>]

On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:19 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm
> > subscribed to at work.
[snip]
> > so why didn't it "thread"?  I have the correct view, because other
> > messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other,
> > but this one isn't.
>
> If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same
> mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread.  Unless there is
> something else going on.

Well then, "there is something going on"!

Both messages are still in my inbox, unthreaded after a few restarts of
evolution.

A third message, a reply from the OP to myself, IS threaded under my
message,but none of them are under the original.  Like so:

- A: original message from OP to list

- other emails

- B: reply to message 'A' from me to list
  - C: reply to 'B' from OP to me

wierd huh? I still have all three messages in my inbox if you want
further info.

-- 
Iain Buchanan <iaindb netspace net au>