Re: [Evolution] threading didn't work in reply-to-all

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same
mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread.  Unless there is
something else going on.

On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm
> subscribed to at work.  I used the reply to all button, then I deleted
> the OP's email from "to" (because he's on the list as well), and then
> moved the list email from "cc" to "to".
>
> Because I get my own posts from this list, I would expect it would be
> threaded under the OP's email in my inbox, but instead it appeared by
> itself.
>
> I had a look at the "email source".  The OP contains
> Message-ID: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
>
> and my reply contains
> In-Reply-To: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
>  References: <42C326C9 7010307 pcorp com au>
> Message-Id: <1120175637 26899 31 camel orpheus>
>
> so obviously evolution understands both the OP's style of threading and
> its own (good :)
>
> so why didn't it "thread"?  I have the correct view, because other
> messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other,
> but this one isn't.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated,
> TIA,