Re: [Evolution] IMAP speed

["Patrick O'Callaghan" <poc usb ve>]

Excellent. I don't care about offline usage so this is a big net win for
me (pun intended :-).

poc

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for
> most users.
>
> Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
> example) ... but the code was re-done to remove a badly thought-out
> implementation that seemed the right way to go at the time.  And some
> locking was tuned to help reduce unecessary contention for locally
> available resources.
>
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
> > I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic
> > improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was
> > always very noticeably slower than TBird but that gap has closed
> > significantly or disappeared entirely.
> >
> > Or is this just my fevered imagination?
> >
> > poc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution