Re: [Evolution] IMAP speed



Excellent. I don't care about offline usage so this is a big net win for
me (pun intended :-).

poc

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:53 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for
most users.

Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
example) ... but the code was re-done to remove a badly thought-out
implementation that seemed the right way to go at the time.  And some
locking was tuned to help reduce unecessary contention for locally
available resources.

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic
improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was
always very noticeably slower than TBird but that gap has closed
significantly or disappeared entirely.

Or is this just my fevered imagination?

poc

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]