Re: [Evolution] IMAP speed

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

No it shouldn't be your imagination, it should be noticably faster for
most users.

Not to say there aren't new bugs now (offline seems a bit iffy for
example) ... but the code was re-done to remove a badly thought-out
implementation that seemed the right way to go at the time.  And some
locking was tuned to help reduce unecessary contention for locally
available resources.

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that
> I installed 2.3.7 an hour ago and seem to be seeing a dramatic
> improvement in startup speed for my (large) IMAP mailboxes. Evo was
> always very noticeably slower than TBird but that gap has closed
> significantly or disappeared entirely.
>
> Or is this just my fevered imagination?
>
> poc
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
-- 
adfa(evolution-2.4:20087): gtkhtml-WARNING **: cannot find icon:
'stock_insert-url' in gnome