Re: [Evolution] IMAP and trash



On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:10 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 22:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: 
> > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 10:50 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 13:09 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > With IMAP, in the 1.4 series, deleting an email would send "haggis
> > > > imap"/Trash (which has a trash can icon next to it), where I could
> > > > do Action->"Empty Trash" to get rid of it.
> > > > 
> > > > Now, deleted emails go to "haggis imap"/INBOX/Trash, which I have to
> > > 
> > > How are they deleted?  You say you have to explictly delete them?
> > > Huh?
> > 
> > By highlighting messages, and clicking on the Delete button.
> The first time, or the second time?
> 
> You say deleted emails go to INBOX/Trash but then you delete them and
> they go to Trash.
> 
> I figured the second case is where you select messages and delete
> them.

Gah!!  Now it's doing something different!

When I delete an email that's sitting in one of my folders, where
is it supposed to go?
"haggis imap"/INBOX/Trash
  or
"haggis imap"/Trash ??
It should only go to the last.  UNLESS, and this is quite possible, your server is doing something stupid like physically moving deleted folders.

And what's the difference between 
Actions|Expunge
   and
Actions|"Empty Trash" ?

One expunges the current folder, one expunges the trash (which may include several physical folders).

Maybe if I know that, I'll be able to explain things better.
 
> > > > then explicitly Delete, which sends them to "haggis imap"/Trash,
> > > > where Action->"Empty Trash" works as normal.
> > > > 
> > > > Is this extra step by design, or a bug?
> > > I have no idea how you managed this.
> > 
> > It's a talent of mine, to make s/w do weird stuff....
> > If you have an imap server (I use courier imap, if it makes a
> > difference), maybe I can walk you through it, via IRC.
> > 
> > > The code doesn't do anything like this.
> > 
> > I promise you, it does.  But then again, maybe we are not
> > talking about the same things.
> 
> Clearly not!  Which is why i asked for clarifiaction, but
> unfortunately its still as clear as mud.

To me, too.  :(

-- 
Ron Johnson <ron l johnson cox net>

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  evolution lists ximian com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Michael Zucchi <notzed ximian com>

Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer


Novell, Inc.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]