Re: [Evolution] SMP Safe?

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:30, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 01:56, Not Zed wrote:
> > Oh debian.  Send them the bug reports then ... they make changes to our
> > code and we can't support it.
>
> Hrrm. :-) Well, I checked that. No code changes in the version I'm
> using, just Debian control files.
>
> > Well, seriously ... i'm thinking of getting an smp machine sometime
> > soon, so perhaps i can have a better go at chasing these issues up.
> >
> > AFAIK there shouldn't be too many issues (many people use it
> > successfully),
>
> I'm probably exercising Evolution a bit more than the average user.

You'd be surprised i think.

> >  but i'm not entirely confident of the code, wrt
> > compilation optimisations and whatnot (possibly needs a few volatile's
> > thrown around in certain places).
>
> You're probably right. Evolution seems more stable now that I compiled
> it with -g. That happened last time too, although eventually I got it to
> crash.

-g doesn't affect optimisation on gcc at least.