Re: [Evolution] Why Two Copies With List Replies?

["Arthur S. Alexion" <arthur alexion com>]

1.2.1, also, and this is a "Reply to list", too.  I think I have it
narrowed down.  If the original message was addressed to the list only,
then "Reply to List" works.  But if the 'original' message was a "Reply
to All" with the sender in the "To" field, and the list in the "cc"
field, then, even a "Reply to list" results in both the sender and the
list as addressees.

On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 16:17, Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 13:23, Arthur S. Alexion wrote:
>
> > Coincidentally, with this list being among the few that do not default
> > replies to the list, it is ironic that the MUA which is its subject
> > treats its "Reply to List" feature as "Reply to All".  There should be a
> > difference.
>
> Eh?  This message is a result of "Reply to List", and it contains only a
> single "To: evolution ximian com" header.  "Reply to All" results in two
> headers ("To: arthur alexion com" and "Cc: evolution ximian com"). Looks
> like a significant difference to me.  FWIW, I'm running evo 1.2.1 on a
> debain testing-ish system.  Are you running an older version?
>
> Cheers!
-- 
Arthur S. Alexion <arthur alexion com>
Arthur S. Alexion LLC