Re: [Evolution] Built-in spam filtering?



Jim Frost (jimf frostbytes com) had this to say on 01/02/03 at 19:07: 

Of course I did.  It has about a 90% success rate and more than a 1%
false positive rate and requires me to diligently keep up the rule
base.  Now, 90% success would be great, but 1% false is a killer.  That
means I'll see like five or ten falses a day, which means I'll be
constantly going through the filtered mail, which defeats the purpose.

I use the latest 2.43 version, and I get much better than 90%, and can't
recall the last time I had a false positive. Perhaps your experiences were
with earlier versions?

Probably 99% of Evolution's users don't run their own servers and would

I think that's an overstatement, altho I will agree to a large majority.

-- 
PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCDF
Member, LEAF Project <http://leaf.sourceforge.net>    AIM: MikeLeone
Public Key - <http://www.mike-leone.com/~turgon/turgon-public-key.asc>
Registered Linux user# 201348

Attachment: pgplDOAz21JMI.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]