Re: [Evolution] Sigs Still Screwed


Have you filed a bug at If not, it probably will
never get fixed.

Additional info, especially how to reproduce it, is needed.

Regretfully, I have not determined how to cause it to happen or not.

But we all agree, that you can hardly iron aout a bug, you can't
reproduce. Let's try it. Watch every little detail, that may cause it.

Are you sure, you need a table for that??

I don't think I do, but Evolution evidently does. I just typed the
three lines into the signature editor and changed the colors of the
lines. And that's it. The table code was generated by Evolution, not

No, you really do not. But I could see the extra blank lines appearing
in you last post. So I checked the mail source and there is a additional
<pre> tag, that was _not_ there with correct sig.

Seems, like there is a flaw i the composer.

I suspect, an additional newline after the last typed words. Can you
verify that by writing mails to yourself?

The code in question:

<FONT COLOR="#0000f8"><BR>
Lane P. Lester / Madison County, Georgia</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#008000">Using Linux more and Windows less</FONT>

It is displayed correct without the <pre> tag. The text/plain version in
the mail is correct too.

What is the paragraph style of your last paragraph? The <pre> tag
indicates 'preformat' instead of 'normal'. Check that too.

btw: That code is displayed correct in mozilla, even with the <pre> tag.
A display bug in gtkhtml?

Lane: You can change that sig code to the tags, you really need. Just
get all the <table> tags out (including <tr>, <td> and the closing


char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0  ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]