On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 07:09, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 21:22, Rev. wRy wrote: [snip]this was removed because it conflicted with a new feature to use auto-completion for jumping to messages (similar to what Outlook does). Not sure I like it either, but it's what people wanted.It's sick and wrong. Period and comma to move between messages? Gak!yea, I don't like it either... but other mailers use this convention also so maybe it's not all that bad? N and P are pretty Netscape-ish.It's all that bad. N & P may be Netscap-ish, but hitting "N" for next message, and "P" for previous is a no-brainer. Please please please change it back. :)Not my decision.
Sigh, how about making it customizable instead of forcing various
"standard ways" of doing things down ppl's throats? Why spoil an
otherwise really nice application?
Just my $0.02
Dirk
--
Dr Dirk Husemann, Pervasive Computing, IBM Research, Zurich Research Lab
hud zurich ibm com --- http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~hud/
PGP key: http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~hud/contact-pgp.html
PGP Fingerprint: 983C 48E7 0A78 A313 401C C4AD 3C0A 278E 6431 A149
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part