Re: [Evolution] GPGME?

From: Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
To: Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
Cc: Ross Burton <r burton 180sw com>, Evolution Mailing List <evolution ximian com>
Subject: Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
Date: 13 Apr 2001 07:13:22 -0400

On 12 Apr 2001 11:28:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:

Yea, we've known about this for a while but it's not anywhere close to
being ready yet. Currently, I don't think it does much more than sign
data, so it needs to get quite a lot farther before we can use it. Also,
it only talks to gpg so that doesn't help us when it comes to the other
pgp implementations :-(


  Well, GPG does everything PGP does and more, plus it's free...  Is
there any particular reason why we might want to actually support the
older PGP?

-- 
Ettore

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Sejal Patel
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Dan Winship

References:
- [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Ross Burton
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Ettore Perazzoli
- Re: [Evolution] GPGME?
  - From: Jeffrey Stedfast

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]