Re: [Evolution-hackers] WebKit port of the composer

On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 09:04 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>         Hi,
> both issues are unrelated to Dan's changes, from my point of view, and
> I suppose both of them are filled as bugs in bugzilla. Dan's effort is
> to get rid of GtkHTML from evolution, while your issues are partly in
> ENameSelectorEntry - the first one, the other one in SMTP provider (or
> somewhere around, in evolution's sending routines). 

I thought they were both aspects of the address editor (presumably
ENameSelectorEntry; I pay little attention to the UI side of evo), and
could have sworn that both had been filed under "oh, we won't care about
those until we revamp the composer and move to webkit".

Was I mistaken? Should we have fixed these bugs years ago?


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]