Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils
- From: Shreyas Sriniavasan <sshreyas novell com>
- To: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- Cc: Irene <Irene Huang Sun COM>, Evolution Hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] About evolution-data-server/libedataser and evolution/e-utils
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:49:08 +0530
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 16:48 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > > Md5-utils.ch are not the only files that are duplicated. Most of the
> > > files in evolution/e-util have similar copies in
> > > evolution-data-server/libedataserver.
> Thanks Ross :-). That really gets us moving to the next step.
>
> Shreyas had taken the cause up [http://go-evolution.org/Evo2.6#Misc]
> early during the cycle and IIRC, had started doing something on it too.
> Shreyas ?
Oh well, i had started doing something about it but it would entail
moving most of the duplicate code out of e-util. This ofcourse would
mean that most of the current e-util dependencies would then also
depend on libedataserver. We never reached a consensus on whether thats
a valid thing to do. If we can have consensus on that then doing it is
just massive sed-awk operation. Ofcourse, a lot of those code werent in
sync either when i last checked. We need to figure out if we need to
make a new gal out of libedataserver. It needs to have stuff which most of
evolution and e-d-s can link to.
When we get around to doing unified account management then this might be
of great help if most of the desired structures are in libedataserver.
So i am waiting for a somebody to validate my line of reasoning here.
Cheers,
Shreyas
--
What can i do? I am just being me
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]