Re: [Evolution-hackers] Performance with Exchange 2003

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

> The other, MUCH worse, is that searches for "" are not properly
> optimized away.  With my config (slow machine, plenty of RAM but CPU
> starved, and 110,000 messages), this results in probably a 100-1000x
> performance hit, truly massive.  I am really surprised that your
> machines are all so fast that this one isn't apparent.  What's the
> slowest thing you use to test for performance regressions?

Umm, ok, so this goes back to the original suggestion - this is a thread contention issue.

So it has nothing to do with searching at all.

Please just get a backtrace, all this worrying about searching speed is just wasting our time.