[Evolution-hackers] Re: Selecting/Unselecting Sources
- From: Hans Petter Jansson <hpj ximian com>
- To: JP Rosevear <jpr ximian com>
- Cc: evolution-hackers ximian com, Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo ximian com>, tigert ximian com, toshok ximian com
- Subject: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Selecting/Unselecting Sources
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:45:05 -0600
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 00:22, JP Rosevear wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 01:40, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 21:10, JP Rosevear wrote:
> > > Basically the UI for showing/hiding calendar sources and selecting a
> > > primary source sucks pretty bad. It allows inconsistencies in the UI.
> > > I've been playing around with this a bit and keep coming up with two
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > 1. Does it make sense to allow a "primary" calendar (the one
> > > highlighted) to not be checked (shown in the view to the right). What
> > > does Apple's Ical do?
> >
> > I think it should be ok for it to not be checked, but we can treat it as
> > if it was, as long as it's highlighted. I think this is what the user
> > expects when he highlights it. If we check a source when it gets
> > highlighted, you'll end up with most of your sources checked most of the
> > time, which can be annoying.
>
> The main issue I see with this is that you will create meetings that
> will disappear the moment you finish creating them (unless "primary"
> implies both displayed and default, which is a little inconsistent).
What I meant was primary == always shown. Without changing the state of
the checkmarks.
--
Hans Petter
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]