Re: [Evolution-hackers] The Junk problem and IMAP
- From: Not Zed <notzed ximian com>
- To: Tim Lee <tim ximian com>
- Cc: Radek Doulík <rodo ximian com>, evolution-hackers ximian com, anna ximian com
- Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] The Junk problem and IMAP
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:15:41 +0800
Hey Tim,
> -- Tim
> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 20:07, Not Zed wrote:
> > Ok everyone, so how about this:
> >
> > - we still have the global junk filter setting
> > - we add 2 new settings to each imap account, which will appear next to
> > the
> >
> > [ ] "Apply filters to new messages in INBOX on this server"
> > ->
> > [ ] "Do not check incoming message for Junk"
> Just a personal preference but generally I think it's more intuitive
> when checking a checkbox to enables rather than disables a function.
>
> Couldn't we label the check box as "Check incoming messages for Junk"
> and have it "checked" by default.
Yeah this is actually how i did it in the end. I did it as above
because that was how the existing code did it internally - i swapped the
sense of the flag.
I don't have it on by default because it requires extra external
dependencies which may not be available, but i suppose that's a
packaging issue.
> > [ ] "Only check for Junk for new messages in INBOX"
> Would this be checked by default? The cause of slowness when copying
> messages may not be obvious, but junk mail in other folders would be.
I don't know, suggestions?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]