Re: Can the favicon extension be added to the default build of epiphany?

On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 00:37 -0500, Adam Hooper wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:45 -0900, Dan Freckleton wrote:
> > What's wrong with supporting the standard implementation of favicon.ico
> > exactly? For what reason is epiphany limited to only displaying 1 out of
> > every 5 of them?
> It produces huge quantities of spurious file requests, which sucks for
> the website host. Admittedly, it's more of a cosmetic issue, since it
> can be worked around. But it's freakin' annoying to see thousands of 404
> errors in your server logs because people tried to access sites you
> never provided a link to.

If IE and Mozilla/Firefox do it already, does it make much difference to
web admins if we do it too? Only the users would seem to notice.

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]