On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 14:40 -0500, William Case wrote: > Hi; > > > On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 12:00 -0500, epiphany-list-request gnome org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 19:45 -0900, Dan Freckleton wrote: > > > > What's wrong with supporting the standard implementation of favicon.ico > > > > exactly? For what reason is epiphany limited to only displaying 1 out of > > > > every 5 of them? > > > > > > It produces huge quantities of spurious file requests, which sucks for > > > the website host. Admittedly, it's more of a cosmetic issue, since it > > > can be worked around. > > How can you (I) work around it? There are two main problems for website hosts: 1. Tons of requests mean more processing time or bandwidth. Workaround: ignore favicon.ico requests. Takes very little processing time and no bandwidth. 2. Server log entries. These can be grepped away. -- Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part