On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 17:14 +1100, Peter Harvey wrote: > On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 23:42 -0500, Adam Hooper wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-11-02 at 10:21 +1100, Peter Harvey wrote: > > > Integration with e-d-s or similar would be perfect. Integrating with > > > e-d-s might cause problems (if people don't want to use Evolution, why > > > must people use e-d-s just to get bookmarks in Epiphany?). > > > > e-d-s isn't only for Evolution. It's badly-named, but it's intended to > > be for all of GNOME (including, say, IM applications). So the question > > then becomes, "Why must people use GNOME just to get bookmarks in > > Epiphany?" And the answer is, IMO, "Who cares? Everyone who uses > > Epiphany uses GNOME anyway." > > > > (I'm a big fan of dependency, the oft-misconstrued reason open-source > > works.) > > Sounds fair. I think that starting writing this outside e-d-s (with a > view to merging later) might be the best bet. I should have mentioned this earlier, but here are two very interesting links I bookmarked a while ago which should be looked over if designing a bookmarks serving system: http://nat.org/dashboard/gnome-idea.txt http://zaheer.merali.org/index.php?p=82 -- Adam Hooper <adamh densi com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part