Re: [Epiphany] Re: "Web Browser"
- From: Daniel Borgmann <spark-mailinglists web de>
- To: David Adam Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>
- Cc: Marco Pesenti Gritti <mpeseng tin it>,Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>,Steve Salazar <eagsalazar hotmail com>, epiphany mozdev org
- Subject: Re: [Epiphany] Re: "Web Browser"
- Date: 22 May 2003 22:40:41 +0200
On Thu, 2003-05-22 at 17:59, David Adam Bordoley wrote:
> The hig doesn't suggest foo.
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/1.0/desktop-integration.html#men
> u-item-names
>
> It says to include a functional description. It also says to remove
> non-essential information from menu names. "Epiphany" is non-essential
> information imo. [1] I want to open my "Web Browser." Any sane distro will
> label the default browser "Web Browser" (like redhat does for mozilla
> currently). If distros want to include multiple browsers, than imo they
> should be responsible for changing the label not us.
What happens if a user installs both KDE and GNOME manually, will he get
two "Web Browser" entries then (considering that KDE does the same)?
Just generally stripping the application name is certainly not possible,
because if a user decides to install the Opera Browser, there needs to
be a way to actually identify this one. Wouldn't it be better to solve
this in a more consistant way than having "Web Browser" among "Opera Web
Browser" and "Mozilla Web Browser" (and in the worst case, another "Web
Browser" beeing Konqueror)?
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]