Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

Don't be discouraged, the app is looking good :)

I guess it's just a matter to open it to a wider world like you just
did, then once things settle down a bit ask to be released it as part
of GNOME. And I don't think is so far away from that, quite the
opposite. Just fixing the most obvious visual bugs + crashes and
having some tarball and package ready for people to try and is
probably ready to go as a preview.

I think that's what we did with other apps in the past. And if not,
would be nice to have that this time.

Carlos Soriano
GNOME Foundation
Treasurer, Board of Directors

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Felipe Borges
<felipe10borges gmail com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Sébastien Wilmet <swilmet gnome org> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:47:29PM +0200, Felipe Borges wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Adrien Plazas <kekun plazas laposte net>
During my quick test I encountered many crashes. The application would
benefit from broader testing and including it as a demo version in a GNOME
release would clearly bring, but having it part of a GNOME release means
branding it to the end users. I would suggest to first get the app in a
more stable test by promoting its usage inside the community before even
discussing whether it should be part of a GNOME release or not, at least
for the next month.

Yes, that's a chicken-egg dilemma. Usage hasn't been tested by many users
so far and we the main motivation of this email was to promote it to a
broader audience.

Is it really a chicken-egg dilemma? Are the crashes and bugs specific to
some hardware or underlying software configuration? Or are the bugs
always reproducible by the maintainer? If it's the latter, I don't see
why it is a chicken-egg dilemma, you have everything in hand to write
(mostly) stable software from day 1.

desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org

Ok, so it is a no-go.

Thanks everybody.
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]