Re: Some points about IM integration
- From: Ma Xiaojun <damage3025 gmail com>
- To: Weng Xuetian <wengxt gmail com>
- Cc: Germán Póo-Caamaño <gpoo gnome org>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Some points about IM integration
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:28:45 +0800
Hi, all.
This thread is not that long, so I've read it all. I'm yet another
native Chinese user.
I agree with the idea of Taylor's origin post.
Some people want framework of frameworks. I appreciate their efforts.
However, I don't think this make sense if we consider long-term.
If someone is trying to make thing simpler and more elegant, go ahead.
I like the Mac OS X way of language settings. I'm happy to see GNOME
is catching up.
I don't know how much integration is done in code. But I think you
should examine both IBus and Fcitx carefully before hardcode anything.
I think the internally more elegant one should be picked.
>From various discussion I've seen, many experienced user would see
Fcitx to IBus migration as a serious regression. So be careful.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]