On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 12:21 +0800, Weng Xuetian wrote: > > I don't want people to draw the conclusion that because I'm saying > that > > input methods should have simple configuration without a lot of > options, > > I think that they aren't important. I'm very aware that every single > > user that comes to GNOME and wants to write in Chinese needs to use > an > > input method. But if we have so many options that the defaults don't > get > > well tested, or if options conflict and produce bugs, then we're not > > shipping a good ';';''''''' > > ' > Options are really required in order to meet people need especially > for input method. This is a basic components for people. Is it possible you can enumerate all those special needs and why are compulsory? Just stating the options are important does not help to understand why, neither gives the opportunity to think or determine which approach would fit better. -- Germán Póo-Caamaño http://people.gnome.org/~gpoo/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part