Le lundi 11 octobre 2010 à 22:37 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov a écrit :
> Thanks for the answer. So, does that mean we directly or indirectly
> recommend to distromakers NOT to allow users to choose between gnome2
> ("real", not "(panel + nautilus)/gnome3") and gnome3 sessions? Does
> that mean we recommend not to bother creating two sets of packages? Or
> we are just neutral and do not care (and we do not help)?
I don’t think there is any use for what you are proposing. The thing
that matters is being able to start either a GNOME + Shell session, or a
GNOME + Panel one.
And it’s not that hard, we already had it with gnome-session 2.30.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
`- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part