Re: 2.91 tarballs?

Le lundi 09 août 2010, à 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> On 9 August 2010 14:15, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> > You can release 2.90.x (not sure why you'd want 2.91 before 2.90 ;-)).
> > Some modules already have such versions.
> 90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?

Ah, hrm. Don't know, I think some implicit rule we have is that 90 is
not stable for us. Or maybe we just declare that 90 is not an even

At this point, given the fact that we already have various modules with
2.90 releases, you can't make things worse by using 2.90. Nothing else
uses 2.91, I think.


Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]