Re: 2.91 tarballs?
- From: Andre Klapper <ak-47 gmx net>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 2.91 tarballs?
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:49:18 +0200
Am Montag, den 09.08.2010, 16:46 +0200 schrieb Maciej Piechotka:
> I thought x.9/x.90/x.900 are beta releases before (x+1).0. See gtk+
> 2.90.4.
Correct.
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > 90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?
Correct that this might create problems, e.g. with library.gnome.org and
some other scripts.
andre
--
mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed
http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
