Re: 2.91 tarballs?



On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 15:39 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 9 August 2010 14:15, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org> wrote:
> > You can release 2.90.x (not sure why you'd want 2.91 before 2.90 ;-)).
> > Some modules already have such versions.
> 
> 90 is an even number, and thus 'stable', surely?
> 
> Richard.


I thought x.9/x.90/x.900 are beta releases before (x+1).0. See gtk+
2.90.4.

Regards

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]