Re: dconf

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 16:58 -0400, Martin Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr> wrote:
> > Le jeudi 02 avril 2009 à 19:39 +0100, Rob Taylor a écrit :
> >> My question would be is why do these "People" have a desktop in which
> >> there isn't a DBus session bus? Its been there for a very long time now
> >> in most distros, afact. For gnome 3.0, running without a session bus is
> >> going to be like running gnome 2.0 without orbit2. i.e. it ain't gonna
> >> work right.
> >
> > How about running application remotely through ssh -Y ? I do it daily,
> > and I really hate when it feils because of dbus (but I must confess
> > lately things got better, like if apps autostart dbus or something).
> >
> 
> (sorry to divert to a slightly different topic, but since we're all on
> the gnome-3.0 wagon today...)
> On a similar note, how will gtk's client-side windows affect
> performance of remote X windows, if at all? Does anyone have any
> thoughts or prediction on that?

I haven't done any measurements, but my guess it will have no effect at
all. We're still drawing in the xserver. Its just the window positions
and sizes that are client side.