Re: dconf
- From: Martin Meyer <elreydetodo gmail com>
- To: Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>
- Cc: Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron sun com>
- Subject: Re: dconf
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 16:58:42 -0400
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr> wrote:
> Le jeudi 02 avril 2009 à 19:39 +0100, Rob Taylor a écrit :
>> My question would be is why do these "People" have a desktop in which
>> there isn't a DBus session bus? Its been there for a very long time now
>> in most distros, afact. For gnome 3.0, running without a session bus is
>> going to be like running gnome 2.0 without orbit2. i.e. it ain't gonna
>> work right.
>
> How about running application remotely through ssh -Y ? I do it daily,
> and I really hate when it feils because of dbus (but I must confess
> lately things got better, like if apps autostart dbus or something).
>
(sorry to divert to a slightly different topic, but since we're all on
the gnome-3.0 wagon today...)
On a similar note, how will gtk's client-side windows affect
performance of remote X windows, if at all? Does anyone have any
thoughts or prediction on that?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]