Re: gnome-session proposal
- From: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-session proposal
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:53:49 +0200
Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 19:35 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 01:08 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > David Zeuthen wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes we do; at least I believe so. I won't complain about my xterms as
> > > > they may be considered a legacy application but modern applications
> > > > written for the other major free desktop should not be left in the
> > > > cold.
> > >
> > > Do you have a concrete example of a modern desktop application where the
> > > absence of XSMP in GNOME 2.24 would be a huge inconvenience?
> >
> > I think you should not limit yourself to GNOME 2.24; people are using
> > other applications.
>
> Uh, I think you misread what I said. I was asking for examples of modern
> desktop applications (e.g applications using e.g. Qt, GTK+, Swing, SWT,
> E17, wxWidgets, XUL etc.) for which absence of XSMP would be a huge
> inconvenience. Do you have any such examples?
Openoffice.org ?
--
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandriva com>
Mandriva
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]