Re: gnome-session proposal

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 01:08 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> David Zeuthen wrote:
> > > Yes we do; at least I believe so.  I won't complain about my xterms as
> > > they may be considered a legacy application but modern applications
> > > written for the other major free desktop should not be left in the
> > > cold.
> > 
> > Do you have a concrete example of a modern desktop application where the
> > absence of XSMP in GNOME 2.24 would be a huge inconvenience?
> I think you should not limit yourself to GNOME 2.24; people are using
> other applications.

Uh, I think you misread what I said. I was asking for examples of modern
desktop applications (e.g applications using e.g. Qt, GTK+, Swing, SWT,
E17, wxWidgets, XUL etc.) for which absence of XSMP would be a huge
inconvenience. Do you have any such examples?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]