Re: gnome-session proposal
- From: Frederic Peters <fpeters 0d be>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome-session proposal
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:08:08 +0200
David Zeuthen wrote:
> > Yes we do; at least I believe so. I won't complain about my xterms as
> > they may be considered a legacy application but modern applications
> > written for the other major free desktop should not be left in the
> > cold.
>
> Do you have a concrete example of a modern desktop application where the
> absence of XSMP in GNOME 2.24 would be a huge inconvenience?
I think you should not limit yourself to GNOME 2.24; people are using
other applications.
Frederic
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]