Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file


Am Dienstag, den 22.01.2008, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Sebastian Pölsterl:
> I agree. Pulse looks really great. Why shouldn't we us it when it already
> exists?

i guess because it's still in the making.

 mailto:ak-47 gmx net | failed  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]