Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file

[Sebastian Pölsterl <marduk k-d-w org>]

Wouter Bolsterlee schrieb:
> 2008-01-22 klockan 01:51 skrev Shaun McCance:
>> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 00:02 +0100, Marko Anastasov wrote:
>> >
>> > What does everybody think about, in the long run, expanding this idea
>> > of mimicing apache projects pages and having one page for each
>> > module where all the "metadata" about the project will be nicely
>> > presented (be it from DOAP files or the files we keep today),
>> > with addition to summaries from recent activity on the mailing list
>> > (eg latest posts, recent most active discussion), bugzilla (similar),
>> > commits and with developers' blogs aggregated (perhaps showing
>> > only those posts tagged with the name of the project to reduce noise).
>> > That would then be a one stop overview of all development activity.
>> >
>> > Just an idea I got recently...
>>
>> That is exactly the sort of stuff that Pulse does.
>>
>> http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/pulse/web/set/gnome-2-22-desktop
>
> IMHO, this stuff should become something like "projects.gnome.org". That
> would be seriously cool.
>
I agree. Pulse looks really great. Why shouldn't we us it when it already
exists?

-- 
Greetings,
Sebastian Pölsterl