Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file

From: Nicolas Trangez <eikke eikke com>
To: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
Subject: Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:33:37 +0100

On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 01:28 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Yes, XML is harder, that is why there should be
> examples.

Or http://crschmidt.net/semweb/doapamatic/

Nicolas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

References:
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Vincent Untz
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Mathias Hasselmann
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Emmanuele Bassi
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Patryk Zawadzki
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Emmanuele Bassi
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Patryk Zawadzki
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Murray Cumming
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Patryk Zawadzki
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Tristan Van Berkom
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Mathias Hasselmann
- Re: Requiring DOAP instead of MAINTAINERS file
  - From: Olav Vitters

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]