Am Freitag, den 18.01.2008, 11:02 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz: > Le vendredi 18 janvier 2008, à 10:52 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann a écrit : > > > Does this sound like a good plan? > > > > Sounds like a bad plan, 'cause DOAP looks like horrible bloat to me. > > No chance that I'd support such a file. Would move to another SVN > > server, before I'd even consider touching this crap. > > > > MAINTAINERS is good: It has a clear purpose and a simple format. > > > > DOAP just is bloated file format with no real purpose, well and guess > > that's the reason for DOAP not taking off. > > Mathias, can you elaborate on why this would be a problem for you? I > mean, the files would be automatically created and mostly automatically > updated, according to Olav's plan. > > While MAINTAINERS is good, there would be more data usable for more > things (Olav already gave some examples). So just saying "no, it looks > like horrible bloat" is not really convincing. If the file you shall maintain looks like a large binary blob, and the file Olav linked looked like that, this is a valid argument. I absolutely do not want to edit unreadable, nearly binary looking XML files. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de> http://taschenorakel.de/mathias/about/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil